2. I will begin to point out your personal and financial guilt for the above-mentioned manifesto with the description of such a just act in a decent place by the dignitaries, citizens and landowners of the illustrious general of the Ruthenian Voivodeship from the lands of Lviv, Przemyśl and Sanok and the Zhydaczewski district in accordance with the law and custom made in accordance and unanimously, as well as the laudum and instructions of the same JW. The V. born dignitaries, officials, citizens and landowners of the General of the Ruthenian Voivodeship of the lands of Lviv, Przemyśl, Sanok and the Zhydaczew County are opposed, however, to the elimination of the above-mentioned manifesto, to the restoration of damages and legal expenses, and to the elimination of the victims of the above-mentioned manifesto in any of the acts made, and to sue your allegiance, which lawsuit You, born chamberlains, are to inform all your social activists. Stand therefore and make excuses. Pisań in Warsaw in 1767, in the month of Septembris, on the first day.
Castr. Prime Minister. Rei. 628 p. 1088-1091.
Sanok, September 1, 1767.
Protest by Sanok landowners because of those elected in the regional council in Wisznia pre-sejm meeting of deputies.
1. When, in various circumstances, contrary to our demands, we decided that for the extra-ordinary pre-sejm sejmik in Warsaw, according to the universals, Jkr.
' The consequence of this lawsuit was the revocation of the manifesto on September 23, 1707, on the part of Gwidon Marcelli Siedliski, the land judge of Przemyśl, Jan Łubek of the king's troops. and Colonel Rzptej, further Michał Kozieracki, Walenty Wąsowicz, Jan Matczowski, Jan Bielecki, Marcin Drelicliowski, Jan Tyski, Alexander Jaworski Piskowicz, Stefan Jan Wilczyński, Piotr Wronowski, Jan Domogyrski, Eliasz Wólczański, Andrzej Popiel, Tomasz Wilkowski. They justify the departure from the manifesto mutatis mutandis as follows: looking at the manifesto cum recessu by JW. dignitaries and officials of the Sanok region included in public records, and without in any way violating the Wisła Parliamentary Assembly, we withdraw the manifesto of August 26. Ob. Castr. Prem. 626 p. 1205, 1206, 1219. It should be added that the last mentioned belonged to the Przemyśl bar.
Mr. n. m. happily reigns over us as well as JO. Prince IMci Karol Radziwiłł, General of the Confederated States of the Republic of Poland, Marshal of the 24th month of August, did not come to Wisznia to elect the deputies, and after the end of the sejmik and the dismissal of our brothers and landowners from electing the deputies and giving them instructions, we received the information, therefore we dignitaries, officials and citizens of our Sanok land, preventing the violation of the holy faith Roman Catholicism and all national rights, and in compliance with the manifesto by the citizens of the General of the Ruthenian Voivodeship at the above-mentioned parliamentary assembly, present on August 26 of the year hereby made, and to the files of the present Sanok town WW. Ignacy Bukowski, Adjutant General Jkr. At the same assembly, in addition to the messages of our fellow landowners, we also express our complaints and complaints to Mci and Mikołaj Szeptycki.
2. Because although our brothers in Wisznia are at the local council, always maintaining the practiced custom at their landowner's session, taking into account the current circumstances, known to themselves and to all of us, WW. Jakób Bronicki, the treasurer of Wiślica, lieutenant of the armored sign, and Stanisław Dydyński, the standard-bearer of Zakoczm, our landowners chose from among themselves their own landowners for the Extraordinary Sejm of Warsaw, and W. IMć, Mr. Mikołaj Szeptycki not only did not declare himself a candidate for the parliamentary function, but was not even present at the same landowners' session, and W. IMć Mr. Ignacy Bukowski, for the first time during this assembly, who was legally recognized as having no property not only in our Sanok land but also in the entire Russian general, was dismissed because he was mentioned to them involuntarily by the citizens of our Sanok land, but only in accordance with his insistent demand from his fellows for this position, without being called upon to do so, and without having been promised any reward, in an unpracticed way, without the consent and consent of these landowners, after uniformly electing the above-mentioned deputies on the third day after the beginning of the assembly, they tried to be elected and received instructions contrary to the holy Catholic faith prevailing in our homeland and to the promotion of national rights.