Blu42 Media

Part 18

page 217/616

9. A. that Mr. Marcin Kraiński, the Sieradz hunter of the spigot tax ex anno 1742 in annum 1743, the administrator, having finished his administrative function, requests to hear the calculation of this function, so this Congress proceeded to hear this calculation, when the same Mr. Administrator demonstrates with his registers that from this spigot tax, in addition to the defalse To Stryj, Drohobych and Niżankowiec the sum of 1,280 zlotys was granted for the permitted conflagration. amounting to and, apart from Stanisławów, Krzywcza, Krukienice and Krasiczyn, which did not import anything for this tax, he selected the sum of 19,297 and from this selected and granted sum, with the funds of JWIMci, the castellan of Przemyśl, he paid such sums. And first, to the WIMci itself, to the Przemyśl castellan, according to last year's declaration of the Przemyśl land, PLN 4,000. WIMci Mr. Drohojowski, the Żydaczewski standard bearer, the rest of PLN 1,000 as commissioner. IMci Mr. Dwernicki Tomasz, plenipotentiary of the Przemyśl land, PLN 300. WIMci v. Wolski, castellan of Przemyśl in his parliamentary capacity, PLN 3,000. WIMci v. Łączyński, chamberlain of the Lviv region ex potioritate PLN. 1036. IMci against the postmaster of Jarosław for keeping the mail, PLN 500. IMci to the postmaster of Przemyśl similitter from the post office PLN. 200. IMci v. Nowosielski, instigator, for services: PLN 100. IMci Mr. Borysławski ad potioritatem PLN. 100. WIMci v. Wisłocki, Gostyń czechnik, the rest of the remaining zloty from the captain's function. 4000; for various expensa related to receiving a decree in the Radom tribunal PLN 105. and he refunded these paid receipts, and because he took PLN for the function of administering this tax. 3,000, and the rest of PLN 2,000 for a former claim to his former captain's position. admits, and since he did not choose anything else, did not leave anything else with him and did not use it for his own benefit, he is taking the oath, so this congress of the same Wp. The Kraiński hunter of Sieradz, admissibilem to this oath, recognizes the rote on this oath: that apart from the sum which I liquidated in the register before the landowners' congress, I have not collected anything else, I have applied all the royalties guaranteed by cities and towns to this sum, and from this sum I have not used anything to harm the landowners for my benefit, and this sum from the tax resulting from none for me It didn't bring any particular benefit, for me

Lord God, help me and your suffering is innocent. Which oath does this Congress take to the above-mentioned WIMci, Mr. Administrator of Indulgence?

10. So that we can have the convenience of regular mail, it is practiced for Messrs. Jarosław and Przemyśl postmasters salaria, so that they can reach JWIM, we recommend to the castellan of Przemyśl and ask for an assignment, and at the same time we make an admonition and precustodial order so that the postmaster of Jarosław does not keep letters to our landowners belonging to him, but publishes them without any difficulties.

11. Peractis itaque praemissis our present congress et reliqua on it agenda, parcendo for the present time, de assensu omnium concivium on the congress hereby praesentium cum iegittima iurisdictionis praesentis conservatione ad feriam secundam ante fest. S. Hedvigis electae proximam anno praesenti incidentem we limit and postpone limitationis praesentis vigore.

Liber disp. ter. Prem. 260 p. 85-91.

Wisznia, September 14, 1744.

Laudum of the Wisła parliamentary assembly.