But maybe. that some passages have been inserted into the original. And so it is unlikely that the original contained: "dum cdii danV\, or in other words, that the king would say: "you will pay two groszy a year from the fief or manor to our treasury, as long as others pay." There is no such limitation in similar grants and regulations. It is possible that they were inserted here in the 16th century, when such a fee ceased altogether, and it was done to show that the rulers are now also entitled to widespread exemption.
Finally, I do not dare to say whether any of the subsequent judgments was not inserted later and was not included in the original itself.
Therefore, from this longer argument it follows: I consider this document to be authentic, namely an inept translation from the Russian original with the names of two witnesses provided by the translator and with probably one paragraph, the above-mentioned, inserted into the original text.
This document is quoted in Michał Harasiewicz's work Annales Ecclesiae Rutheuae, page 66. The author, quoting a short passage from the document, says: "Ex illo decreto apparet tuuc pertinuisse ad episcopatum Ruthenum Premisliensem bona Strylki, Tyssowica, Ploskie, Lelina, Potok, Woloszynowa, Wola Koblanska, Zawadka. Lużek, Nahujowice, salis coctura Samboriensis, Sozan, Malkowice, Tarnowce, Gniewnowice, Kalników, Małe Stubience, Makuniew, Korostawice, Dziewięczyce, Boniewice, Pleszowce, Grochówce, laksmaniee, Komarnice etc. How accurate and faithful this citation is, anyone who read the document above could see for themselves.
*) It should be: fratrum nostrorum dilectorum, of course.
^) Servicium, perhaps senitorum or servicii, i.e. servants.
^) Probably rather tvladistu:u.
•*) Scilicet: Jioc orderliness.
^) This is the above-mentioned church of St. Jana in Przemyśl.
*) In fact, there should be a fourth case here, depending on further damus et donamus, but such errors are repeated here constantly.
') Walawa, Hnatkowice, Tarnawce villages in the district. Przemyśl, today only the first property of the Przemyśl Bishopric. gr.
*) There is no such village today, maybe Nienowice in the poviat. Jarosław, today private property.
') Probably Kalników in the district. Mościskie private property.
"•) There are a dozen or so villages named: Monasterz, Monaster, Monasterek, Manaster, Manasterz, Manasterek, Manasterzec in Galicia.
") Hruszowice in the Jarosław County, Stubienko in the Przemyśl County, Makuniów in the Mościce County, Wielunice in the Przemyśl County, Korostowice in the Rohatyn County, Dziewięczyce in the Przemyśl County, Boniowice in the Bircza County, Buszkowice, Pleszowice, Grochówce, Jaksmanice, Kormanice and Kłokowice in the Przemyśl County. Of all these estates, today only Wielunice belongs to Greek Orthodox bishopric of Przemyśl.
'-) The actual name of this place was Mostyszcze, as can be seen from the records of the municipal archives in Przemyśl. Today, no trace of this name remains. The land of this village was to be taken by the San, at least that's what it was claimed according to the acts in the 17th century. century. However, due to the fact that it still has the Przemyśl bishopric. gr. near the town on the San River, a village called Wilcze, a name that emerged only in the 17th century. century, after the disappearance of that name, it seems very probable that these Mościska are today's village of Wilcze.
'*) And here we cannot decide which monastery we are talking about.
**) The name Mikuliuce probably refers to the next ąiiinąue curiolae, today neither known in Przemyśl nor under it, just like the next airiola Sczehotczicz.
•*) It means in the Samborszczyzna, the next towns are supposed to be in the Samborszczyzna.
•*) Straszewice, Babina in the Samborski district. Yolkovichi will probably be Wołcza dolna in the district. Samborski. The monastery of Saint Spas may be the present village of Spaś in the same district. Sozan, a village in the same district. Of all these towns, today only Straszewice belongs to Bisko. industry obj. greek.
'') There are two villages with the name S m o 1 n i c in these parts, one in Lisz County, the other in Sambor County. However, we may be talking about the village of Smolnik in the district. Liski, which today belongs to the Przemyśl chapter of the Greek obj.
'*) Ławr is a village in Sambor County.
") A later hand corrected it to Ono/frzego. In 1469, the monastery of St. Onuphrius belonged to the village of Kanafosty in the Ruda County, and formerly Sambor County.