ktiiia belonged to this manor for centuries, and all the benefits that can be enjoyed and anything for the fire. These works may have been made - Mr. Wacław bought all this at a fair. who rose to the sanctification of his own eternity, Vasil, who is called Skitticz, and his brother, whose name is Hinko. and with their son's son. Olenka. - Mr. Wacław acquired all three mentioned here. and he gave a thousand pieces of weighed silver, and he gave all three of them the silver with his own hand. Then they all came together and gave the manor together with all the surroundings to Mr. Wacław in their name and that of their relatives | homesteads according to their own will, and for others they declared that Paul Wacław had the right to use these resources in good peace, just as he was opposed to Mr. Błociszewski, voivode of Lviv. And the witnesses were the townspeople: lords Kneti and Michno, the mayor of Jarosław; and fighters: Piotr Noszenka and Chodźko Ijojewicz; pop: Dyonizy, pop Jurko Kropyszewicz and pop Lój; nearby neighbors: Onisym; deacons: Szczepan Mełechowicz, Melenty Kucewicz, Semen Ponakhidycz and Iwan Kuźmycz: and finally beekeepers: Paszko, a beekeeper from Jemelin, Jurko Mosznicz, Michno Wielkol)0lski and Hoiko Z;<!eski. And Cho. Ior Felczyc traveled around this land on the orders of Mr. Ota, the starosta, and was also a witness to this letter, which was written in the year one thousand three hundred and seventy from the birth of God. And Hrudkiewicz wrote Iwan in Donju Knetla for centuries amen.
The parchment original in the Lviv city archive no. 4, on a red silk string, hung on plain wax, an embossed coat of arms stamp, with such indistinct markings. that they are no longer recognizable today, It was printed for the first time in its entirety according to the late's copy. Mr. Zuhrzyckieco in Files. relating to the history of the western Rossvi [Aktiu. OTHOCAi|iV<-:c<ft k& MCTopiH sanaĄHOH Poccih], volume I., N. o, page 20. However, having looked through this reprint more carefully, we have come to the belief that the publishers of Akty - or rather, their correspondent Zubrzycki - will not act with particular precision in this case. IJo, even if we wanted to ignore the errors caused by replacing the letters: h. w, a, -ki. 'k, o^* and the like to: i, o, H, u, e, y etc., then we cannot by any means agree to shortcomings of the kind that I
') These statements seem to indicate that this document, issued on behalf of King Casimir and his son, Ota, was probably only a re-enforcement of an agreement that had actually already been concluded before the voivode, Btociszewskini of Lviv.
-) Zubrzycki in the chronicle of the city of Lviv, p. II., fi36), which proves that King Casimir the Great, on whose behalf this document was issued, died not in 1371, but on November 1, 1970. However, since the document itself does not provide the slightest information to question its authenticity, nor any indications that would justify the assumption that the number 1371 is only a simple mistake of the writer, there is nothing else left for us to do. as soon as we look at another, slightly more probable way of translation. And in fact, explaining this seemingly complicated collision for Janek from Czarnków in 1870 usually followed the custom of their church, which began the new year not in January, but in September. he recorded already under the year 1371. Therefore, it seems that this document also received the date of 1371 only because it was issued in the month of September and October, or in any case no later than in the first days of November 1370.
is, for example, the omission of the word: 'pana' [lord] in the formula 'i stalo sia pry derzhave pana Otka, starosty ruskoho zemskoho' [and it happened during the tenure of lord Otko, the Ruthenian land starosta]; or such as the insertion of the words: 'i zapys' [and the record] instead of the words 'i za nykh' [and for them] in the formula: 'tohdy ony pryshedshy kupovaty, ohliadaia... i za nykh ousiadly' [then they, having come to buy, inspecting... and settled for them] etc. Furthermore, not indifferent to the historical researcher are, among others, also the errors that arose due to the incorrect spelling of some proper names, as a result of which the name 'Dmitrii-Dionisii' was changed directly to 'Denisk', and the proper name 'Ignatii' to 'Igonii' and many, many others.
Read and translated by E. Kałużniacki
IX.
in Sanok, May 31, 187?.
Władysław, Duke of Opole, grants the village of Jabłonica to Przemysław, son of Plial / Łęczyca Land. located in Sanok County.