it is also important that we should omit it here. It reads as follows
') The witnesses are given as follows in the manuscript: dottthw Hermano Procuratore Terrestri, caateUano Woyiiycienti ilomino SpylKone T/tarnowicnsi, iloiiiino Dohenlao Cracouiensi, Wyhzkone Sandomiriensi, domino lohanne lura. This number of dignitaries actually dates back to the years 13-16, but it is clearly messed up in the manuscript, I tried to give it the shape in the text that I think it should have. The title of the first witness, whom you usually call;; jtrociirator cracouiensis lul) yeneralis, cannot surprise us. Procurator terre ijeneralis he writes, e.g. in code. diploma Malopolsk. p. 2J9. — The second witness apparently omitted the iniig, which I added in the text, the third witness Spytek is the castellan of Krakow, I replaced Tharnouiensi with Cracouiensi, Spytek or Spycymir never spelled himself Tarnowski. In my opinion, this is where the mistake came from. that the copyist who entered this document into the book, which was not only a property, but even a Melsztyński subordinate, wanted to clearly indicate that we were talking about a member of this family. I gave the next two witnesses, Dobiesław and Wilczek, the dignity they held at that time. It is also strange that the last witness, Jan Jura, was not given the dignity of chamberlain of Krakow in the document. — I do not think that this document is a forgery, despite these mistakes, but I attribute them to the carelessness and confusion of the copyist. However, the order of these witnesses is also striking: Herman is at the forefront, the castellan of Wojnice before the castellan of Krakow, but then the order of dignity in the line of witnesses is not strictly observed.
Anno domini niillf-simo triceidasiino (jHruinujbsimo dominus Spi/czmirus, castellanus Cracouiensis, fiindrwit castrum McUthin et eclesias guamjńttres ibidem pertinentes. Quiquidem dominus Spiczmirun casłelloniis Cracoviensis ohiit ferin tercia post dominiccan Ittdica (27. Mafca) unno domini millesimo tricentesimo quinąua(/esimo secundo.
We therefore obtained the date of death of Spycia, the progenitor of the Melsztyński and Tarnowski families, which was not known until now. Compare Szajnocliy Jail. and Jag. ed. 2.II. p. 34.
VIL
in Drugno on August 24, 368
Casimir the Great confirms at the request of Ilan Kmita from Wiśnicz, starosta
Ruthenian, forged privilege of Prince Bolesław the Chaste of on November 16, 1286, even extending the rights granted by this privilege on Jan Kmita's property, which will be purchased in the future.
In Christi Nomine Amen. Quoniam ea, que in tempore aguntur, ne simul cum tenipore pereant, uecesse est, ^ollempiii literarum titulo, fidedignorura testimonio ad perpetuaiu rei memoriam rohorari, proinde nos Kazimirus Del gracia Rex Polonie; necnon terranini Cracouie, Saudomirie, Syradie, Lancicie, Cuyauie, Pomeranie Paissieque dominus et heres notuin esse cupimns there presentibus quam futuris, quod in nostra baroiiumąue nostroram constitutus presencia nobilis strenuusque miles dominus lohannes, dictus Kraytlia, heres dc Wyshnicze, capitancus terre nostre Russie, nobis fidelis et dilectus, privilegium prcdetessoris nostri Boleslai, olim ducis Cracouie, sub ipsiiis vero sigillo nostre raagestati exhibuit, supplicans liiimiliter, quatinns dictum privilegium nostris regalibus literis confirmare, ratificare et iiniovare dignareraur de nostra gracia ac benignitate speciali. Tenor vero dicti privilegii de verbo ad ^^erbura noscitur et erat talis:
In Nomine Domini Amen. Cum res gestas aboleat processus temporuni, confirmat illas sollerapnis titnlus litei-arnm. Noverit igitur tam presens etas. quam futura posteritas, quod nos Boleslaus, Dei gratia Dux Cracouie, Sandomirie, Syradie et cetera ob fidelia multipliciaque obsequia, que nobis strenuus miles, dominus Oceslaus, heres de Wysznicze, multipliciter exhibuit et auctore domino exhibere poterit in futurum, ipsum Oceslaum cum sua posteritate necnon familiam, kmethones, thabernatores, molendinatores et quoslibet iucolas in hereditatibus seu rillis suis infrascriptis et earum silvis aut mericis, locatos et locandos, videlicet in Conussza, in Damyanicze, in magno et parvo