1) H [And ruling all the Ugro-Wallachian land] — this title was used only in Slavic and Greek documents. The best proof of this are the letters of the Tsargorod patriarchs (published in Acta patriarchatus Constantinop., ed. Miklosich et Müller, Vindob. 1860, vol. I. 383, 386 etc.), in which, when we reach the oldest ones, even Prince Alexander, father of Władysław Basaraba, is constantly called: *0 £Jv£vś;TaT:;.u.Ś7a;?,zi^złx: /.r. y'j&iT.r,: r,izr,c OJ-,'-,'p:pXax(a; ~ The most noble and great voivode and autocrat of all Ugro-Wallachia. The metropolitan of Multany was called similarly, but also only in Slavic and Greek documents (See Acta patriarchatus Constantinop. I. 535. et a. l.; De officiis ecclesiae et aulae constantinopolitanae of Gretser, pag. 129 sqq.; Magazinu istor. III. 263; Istoria critica I. 45) no differently than iJ.r,Tps7rcAi'TY;(; (jipsuc Ou-p,'po-fiAay_(a; =: metropolitan of the Ugro-Wallachian land (literally — part).
2) [As duke of Almaș and [herzeg] (See Daničić, Rječnik III. 412) indicates that the southern Slavs got this word not directly from the Germans, but indirectly from the Magyars.
B-krpi^uKki, Acc. pi., undoubtedly corresponds to the lu"awidł oi,TpkCKki and was created in such a way that the oy syllable was replaced by the usual custom among Serbs and Ruthenians (see Szafarzyk's note. Serb. Lesekórner, pag. 18., or Daniczyca, in his Hvalov rukopis, Starine III. 39. etc.) into bt*, and the suffix. kCKTk na m\k-^.
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
it is omitted in the Hazdeua edition (.\rchiva istorica 1. c.) because it is a very common formula (formula ordinaria) in Romanian diplomacy. And in fact, this formula, commonly called enchantment (saKAHHaHHie PocncAi^^TKO-AłH), as well as the introductory and final formulas, were almost the color of diplomas from the times of Prince Mircza and Vlad. Even in later times, e.g. in documents issued by Wład Władowicz (in Archiva istorica Hażdeua, vol. I. page 5). and in documents originating from from the 16th and 17th centuries, from the era of the reign of princes Vlad Radulovich, Radu Mihnea, Alexander Ilias, Matei and Serban (in Venelin op. c. on pages 159, 278, 294, 301, 328), we encounter these formulas as a permanent writing custom in Multany. However, in documents written in Moldavia, these formulas appeared only as an exception. So far, I am aware of, for example, only one document from 1584 (in Venelin pp. 216—218), in which the Moldavian hospodar Peter, confirming the possession of Lake Orzechowa to the Choniów monastery, speaks as follows: fi nc h.»iiih,wx;KHK<>T'k. kto uSAtT-k h,\h ndKTx kSaj, kcpo bop-k liSKtCKrw rocnc>A«tpf<»'K khth HauicH s^mah moa- AaucTiH. Tor'k kh Mt a,\f aKH CH AJiAii. H Kp-kuHAk c[KAVaa [And after our life, whoever will be hospodar from our children, or from our tribe, or even someone else, whom God will choose to be hospodar of our Moldavian land, let him not disturb this holy monastery, but let him give and confirm this]
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]
[fragment illegible in the scan of the first edition]