') Monastery of Demetrius of Thessalonica and r. Berde, and in it there is a church named after Demetrius of Selunsky made of wood with porches and a porch, and in the church there is an image of the local Demetrius of Selunsky, and the image of the Most Holy Theotokos of the capital, the doors of the church are all in Irovelets, an ancient movable cross, wooden church vessels, linen vestments, a velvet mantle; yes quish: the Gospel on the throne is printed, the evangelists are copper, two octoi, aaostol, menaion, service book, colored triodion - all printed, the Lenten triodion, the psalter with the following written, and there are bells in front of the church, and on the vei there are two bells about two pounds. Yes, in the monastery, in the kflyats: “Efimy is smart, Elder Deanasius, and Elder Mitrofan, and in the cell ■the monastery Fedka Semenov, and in the monastery there is a holy gate, and there is a kleshsus.” After that, the circumference of the monastery is described in detail > ■villages listed to the vein, in which there are 39 peasant households ■ 19 farmsteads are listed. Finally, the rolling forests belonging to the monastery are listed. The church of St. Sergius is not mentioned in this misw.
And. •. Gopak.,
niiii, 1 and which ended by 1678 *). To resolve Zyazhba, a general search was ordered to be carried out on the spot. The testimony during the search said that the disputed land was originally settled by peasants from the Dmitriev Monastery and that they left it when the arrival of military people - the Tatars - passed. This last note testifies to the existence of the Dmitriev Monastery in the 16th century. The arrival of military people - Tatars, of course, is called raids here
') The contents of this document are as follows: Ryazan resident Fyodor Golitsyn in YY4 was granted an estate near the Dmitriev Monastery on the river by Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich. Verde; but he, based on some vague expressions of the grant, appropriated to himself the land that belonged to the Dmitriev Monastery, the so-called Shilina glade, located on a hill opposite the monastery on the south side; paved a bridge across the river to this clearing. Verdu, cleared the road and cut hay in the clearing; but the monastery peasants 1083 shocks of mown hay, worth 32 rubles. with half a ruble, they took some of it to their own yards, and some of it to the monastery. Ryazan resident Fyodor Golitsyn started a lawsuit with the monastery over this incident. The abbot of the monastery argued that the seized land of Iastari belonged to the monastery and referred to another lawsuit that the monastery had initiated about the same land with one local resident Naum Sviridov at the beginning of the 17th century. In 1623, the abbot said, Naum Sviridov captured this land; but when the monastery filed a complaint against him, he soon returned it and made peace with the monastery brotherhood. So, in Moscow, no information about this process was found in the Judgment Order, and in the scribe books of the Riga district, the scribe Grigory Kireevsky, among the monastic lands, Shilina Glade is not clearly marked; then Tsar Fyodor Alekseevich, by letter, ordered the governor of Skopinskon, Kozma Lopukhin, to make the inquiry about Shilina Glade a large general search, namely: ask the people who live along the Verda River, about six miles or more, all the way to Skopin, about the ownership of this glade to the monastery. During a general search, the surrounding residents, archers, townspeople, volost peasants and zashechny watchmen showed that the land had been a monastic land since ancient times; To this testimony they also added that in the old days monastery peasants lived on the sleigh bottom, they sown grain and had vegetable gardens, and that these peasants left the clearing for the village of Ermolovo, near the monastery, when the arrival of military people - the Tatars - had passed.
local legends about the Kulikovo Vatp. 69
Crimean Khan, which often occurred during the 16th century, ■ at the end of this century ceased, at least in part! terrain.