Many similar complaints were brought to the Apostle, but we will cite just one more to show how with the greater wealth of the Commonwealth, more was taken from him.
Ivan Kirsta says: my dfd served in the Cossack Communist Party, and my father paid for the Gadyatsky castle per year, according to Zr. and didn’t know any more work.
And I, former colonel Charnysh, have to pay 5 rubles a year. chinshu. And the late Miloradovich ordered to take 7 rubles. 20 k. And on top of that they threw on a sholka of 10 kh., 1 r. 80 k, and sold for | r. 40 k. In 70) Pokazanshchina == payment from the distillery cauldron, boiler, in 1724 he paid collectively from the spring mill 60 kopecks each.. kozazanshchina - | r. 40 k., tithe on tobacco for 20 p.; and the colonel (wife of Mikh. Milorad.) was forced to force the prison until he paid the same to her. Delivery to Tsaritsyn - 7 rubles. V_ 1795 distance chinshu 12 taderov, shown - 1 r. 80 kopecks, per-cut [from a mill wheel) - 60 kopecks, tobacco tithes - 6 p., tsfna 70 kopecks each; Tyutynnioka welfla take on your own work, without paying, what a reality. myth must 7 r. 80 1796 paid, chinshu 12 tal., shown - {. 80 kopecks for a mill - 60 kopecks, tithe on tobacco - 6 p., sh pood; half-length - | r. 60 k. To St. Petersburg. to drive their colonel's cattle, 80 oxen, on their horses and for their grub - and this colonel Pan Gavril (Miloradovna) Chinsha received 7 rubles 20 kopecks, povolovschina - 2 thalers, pokoleschina - 60 kopecks and tobacco tithes - 395 papush.
In the above stories, by the way, we see examples of the cruelty of the powers that treated their subjects, which shows that the personal freedom of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth did not in the least protect their personality from the torture of the rulers. In particular cases, the cruelty with which the ruler reconciled any disobedience of his subject sometimes reached the point of committing violence...
Here is one of these primfrs: the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Malykh Budishch, Andrey Pugach, writes to the Gadyatsky colonel: (1733) - “I love the little daughter of Euphrosinio, on the occasion of extreme poverty, too. uvfchya and her widowhood, from afar it was for food and service to the former Gadyatsky colonel Mikhailova Miloradovicheva, Mrs. Ulyanf, from whom she, my daughter, lft 18, learned the art of weaving again.
During all this time, my daughter Maloros. pospol, cross, a = vfrno served as lady Miloradovicheva, without receiving any pay.
This year, last June 21, without Miloradovich’s presence at home, my daughter ACE came to me, in the monastery village of Mal. Budishcha, ‘kav before the FATHER, “to the living room”; but the master’s servants immediately came for her and took her to Hadiach; and having brought her there, Mrs. Miloradovicheva immediately “plotted her to the servants, so tyrannically with headpieces on the back and along the stomach, especially by deliberately placing her legs, she showed by the shameful blow, but both the results could not be held in the insides... One of the kind of inhuman tyranny that came out in blood, (for with her slippers (shoes) Miloradovich’s father, with her eyes and teeth, broke everything, about this the widow of Olena Shcherbakh, who married the army in secret, looked at my wife) on the third day my daughter died, without the proper church ritual.” And although the parochial priest of Petrovsky Simeon Vasilyevich was forbidden by the lord of Gadyatsky to bury the body of my daughter, without inspection by the civil authorities, he, however, was a priest, “knowing corruptly” (i.e., having been bribed) obeyed the order and buried... "7!) This kind of complaint, as we cited in these stories, most of the time they only looked at papers, and even then only ever; reviewing the dbla on these complaints in the archives of the general military captain's office and the Little Russian colleague, we found very few cases when the court decision, which was made in favor of the peasants, was enforced, since the appealing power was already the most recent action... Mostly it happened that if the peasants' complaints were accepted by the St. respecter71) Arch, Mlre. Code", Le 409, <. ZCh about the takers, then the complainants were given a ship’s “maternity leave,” obliging the owner of the claimant to satisfy the peasants for their material losses; `But it all ended when such decrees were not carried out... The corruption of the court and the administration, which we will talk about in detail in another article, put the peasants in a hopeless situation and further, tfm bolfe killed their energy...
Therefore, in the complaints of the powers about the disobedience of the peasants, we rarely find any protests on their part against the powers’ oppression and oppression.