10 on their soils they live, from subteit and consistants in the service of other national duties not to be free, but in this way they would be given out: whoever besieges from the owners on their own purchased grouvtB, he would besiege them with this soil, give to the pleasure of the consistants and. performed other national duties, etc. If you want your subjects to rule, have your own in proportion. And who, on the purchased soils, by the Russian Academy of Sciences themselves and the goats, only live in huts in vegetable gardens, without soils (without arable land) to live and earn money with zozhon and. ground and that's it. - they feed themselves, their wife and their family, and they would have to pay 2 kopecks per month for the provision of food supplies; and whoever owned a horse or a working ox, they would be charged the same amount of tax, from each horse or working ox, for a month of three kopecks.” *°*) This was soon approved by the empress, and from then on the fate of the sub-nationals changed significantly:
“By going out into the community,” the peasants no longer got rid of zemstvo duties, and that’s why the number of sub-counties of the Cossacks and the military was due to this. time began to decrease significantly.
But before: the sub-society could not return - once”; because the administration has preserved the rights of the peasants. non-transition, no means to follow the people from them who left theirs; Osflosti; and another, because the powers always had the opportunity to hide their subordinates from the administrative control; one can guess about the last day from the fact that according to the audit books, “ownership” sub-post offices are not mentioned; The sub-national powers went into line with ‹“nod104) Notes from Yak. Markovicha, 1, 509, with data” and only during audits could they be taken into account for the zemstvo tax. The way of life of the sovereign's sub-Sossfdkov on dêl5 indeed, little has diverged from the “subject”, which can be seen, by the way, from the existing obligation of the sub-sosfdkov given to its owner:
“1798, September 16th day, I have submitted below, I give this signature on my behalf to the nobleman, his hon. to Pav Andrei Markovich, the treasure of the military general, my lords, in that his lordship, in his respect, granted the MNF, in his lordly dignity, to the village of Shabalinovf, a yard with a vegetable garden, his own purchased, for the living of the MNF; and I, having accepted such a courtyard and living in it, will, by order of his nobleman, in all duties, be obedient (without any opposition or censorship) with a zealous lie-down and in-fringe service; and to his master's subjects - in kindness, they should not bear any insults, and also not buy up their lands; equally should not incur any losses in the master's good; and I will not commit vain insolence in the village of Shabalin, against the master’s subjects and against the will of the noble master, under any pretext.
And if I don’t fulfill all this, then I will be completely alien to the respect of any of his lords and the above-mentioned palace and garden and subject to the punishment of the Lord. It was signed by Ivan Zhelyazo himself.” *°h) These are the obligations that the owner's sub-sosfdki and tfm not menfe imposed on themselves, this sub-society was profitable, given the great value of the paiska 195) In my collection, “protection,” among the administrative and owner’s arbitrariness.