Ole flattery ASYA shadows 22308 28) Arch, Mlre, Col" "Le 757, howl lasse pasha of the hetman, so with the look of his kindness to the army, the consolidation of departing services, as well as with the look of the same, before you DDF of his glorious memory, for good in the same army I worked hard, `and now his father p. Asaul, our military general, has shown his worthiness in his own way, we give him the village of Ivakhniki, which belongs to us, the future Lokhvitsky district, allowing him to take control of the village of 015 people to compel poslushenstvo (customary allegiance) and take away labor duties; We want and order that P. Mahayla Gamalfi should come into this village with all the common people of the Cossacks, who are still in control of their Cossack freedoms, so that they obey him in everything and give due poslushenstvo (customary allegiance) 2?) 10) The flattering of the Starodub Colonel Miklashevsky.” 1697 - “respecting the military and radftelsha of P. Ivan Bulashevich, a comrade of our distinguished military servant, two military servants, he was allowed the village of Kosachi in hundreds of Pochepovskaya, in the state of Mfti, until the affection of his most noble hetman; en masse, surrounded by the Cossacks, ask him to give poslushenstvo (customary allegiance) to Ivan Bulashevich.” *3) We see that in Khmflnitsky’s universals in Vygovsky, there is a mention of the “poslushenstvo (customary allegiance)®” of the peasants, 27) In my collection.
28) Arch, Mlre. Col., Le 8757. We do not cite these royal letters of grant, since they were given mainly on the basis of the hetman's universals and contain, for the most part, a pre-cemental repetition of these documents, 9 * that inhabited one or the other. But already in 1662, the peasants were clearly instructed to be obedient to the owner of the property and serve the usual (duty) service in his favor. For you, in the subsequent universals - the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth peasants, without any inclusion, undertake to listen to the owner (derzhavtsf) of the worldliness they are inflicted with. In the same excerpts from the universal grants, we see the names of 70,000 peasants everywhere. In general, heavy peasants were those who owned land, that is, land (estate), field land and working livestock. Taxi (according to the Lotov statute - otiiniy) peasants were called in distinction from the leznykh °*°) peasants who did not have the burden of osfdlosti and moved from mfota to meto until they settled in the "slobod." The middle between the taxes and the wastes was soiled - gardeners, who owned one estate, with vegetable gardens, without field land.
There is little difference in the life of tax workers and vegetable gardeners; the first were wealthy and lived on grain earned from their land; between the gardener's tbm they earned grain on someone else's land; imfviye cattle in half, and those imfvishe him - in crowds. Thus, the Little Russian peasants, due to the peculiarities of their eco-economic life, lasted on the i2ya7lmee, 0city dwellers and useful people.
Having received the universal status, the ruler received the right to the “poslushenstvo (customary allegiance)” of the peasants who were imfli in this minor swap. osfdlosti, i.e. tagly in vegetable gardens.
But the boundaries of “0029) The origin of this name from potiekogo 1а2пу, 16е0у == idle, free, poslushenstvo (customary allegiance)”, as we have seen, clearly did not denote the people (all due poslushenstvo (customary allegiance) n’ only) and this uncertainty in the relationship between the ruler and his new subjects led to quarreling between nomi.
According to the hetman’s “reward”, the ruler receives a village, a village or other populated area, with its accessories, i.e. land and water, and the right to obey the main peasants - the inhabitants of this area.
At the same time, the peasants have two questions: 1) will the sovereign, in all likelihood, receive the right of ownership of the lands in our possession, from the peasants? 2) What kind of poslushenstvo (customary allegiance) should they, the peasants, give to the powers?