Thus, with the release of the Polish lords; the right of the latter to land ownership passed to the “army”; the hetman, being the representative of the latter, could distribute Host land (viyskova zemlya) to starshyna and ordinary comrades for their “military” service. The pospolyevo, who lived on such land, with its transfer into the ownership of one person, became obligatory in relation to the latter, i.e., for the use of the land, they had to give the sovereign, the owner, a certain part of their labor. From such emigration in the last years the Little Russian peasantry was formed as an unfree class.
The hetman began to distribute military lands as soon as he began to claim independent power, that is, starting from Khmelnitsky.
“The state fathers of the Gustani monastery of the cenobitic monastery were thirsty from us, and they were thirsty from the pious princes and lords of the godly Christian patrons, for the church of God and for the praise of the name of his saint, now, for the remission of their sins, not a little and for the ground for the recovery of those who were hesitating with that matchmaker, - they adapted this with 0b% seizing his lands only by the right of the strong...
And why the hell would the Russian administration not support the Cossacks at that time (mainly in 1722 - 1752) with various philanthropies. (during the revism of 1795 and the decree of 1159, January 8, which forbade the Cossacks to sell their lands), then they were threatened with the same fate as the Little Russian peasantry. The fate of the Little Russian forging, as a property, could be the subject of very Pemonoz grudge for the understanding of the hetman, “Via e Ch diligently and with our own efforts and soil and farms, and with it and for our help, we adapted the poor people .... before they asked for a pass, so that their kgrushts and Futorov would not accept them and their soils before the army of their subjects, so leov, as well as harvests p pasbk... that we are on oh prose, like a pilgrim of our own, all together, without greedy violation, we will take you under our caresses” *°).
How many of these acts have been carried out, almost all the pastors have received this confirmation.
For tfm, Khmelishchi approved the land rights of those from the former large landowners of Fltsev, who helped him in the war for liberation, for example. in 1656, Khmelnytsyu claimed for the Rubtsy brothers and several villages that they owned and for the Poles; “looking at the masters Rubtsov, Mikhail and Ilya, and their servants in our army: Zaporozhek, they gave themselves up to the villages of Kuroziovo, Razhenichi and their friend. pretentiousness or power, being in Starodubov’s povftb”
17). In another universal of his, 1657, we say that “he allowed the hetman, the nobles, whom Almighty God had amassed before the Zaporozhye army, the toils and the soil of their powers to get along, as they had long lived together” *3).
Beyond t6m, we already meet a continuous series of hetman and senior generals (mostly colonels), generalists for service, for military merits.
16) Arch. Chernig. Kazen. Pal. a bunch of acts of Gustynek, Monet, Similar acts of other monasteries are also stored there, 17) Acts of the South and West. Rosem, ed., Arch. Kom, Sh; 545; 18) Arch. Mlre, Kel, L 4713, I I. her, It is interesting for us to study, according to these acts, in what position the granted generalists were placed towards the powers of one or another inferiority - the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, who inhabited this inferiority, in order to determine their relationship. between the powers and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, who lived in their toils, To do this, we draw a number of excerpts from. of these generalists: |} Uviversaa Bogdan Khmelnitsky 1657” “having a special look at the village of Pavel Yarmultovsky, with our help we bewitch his village with power.
The named Verbichi, also in the village of Gorbovo, carried six; mfti tedi we want and we sternly reprimand, anyhow zhadep za starshyna officer and rabble ‘the troops of our spoiled paymenshy’ pre-nagban in the landholding (derzhannya) of takh villages, the replaced P. Yarmultovsky did not care to repair 19). 2} Vygovsky's Universal of 1659 - “having a special glance more important to the army of the zaporozkom of Ivan Domontovich, the centurion of Slabinsky, merit, we give him the Far East of the village: Smolin and Maxim, lying in the military forces and the Chernihiv regiment, which I sat down so tightly, as if I were landholding (derzhannya) I get along with the reaps, no matter what I don’t recognize, and I’m greedy for the elders and the mob for exchanges of villages and all the accessories, I didn’t bother to bother” o '°) Collection of universals on the scale, manuscript Chernig.