#< Hai r e e. i g.. Page: from top from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom from bottom note from top from bottom from bottom - from bottom from bottom from top from top from top from bottom from top from top from top from bottom from bottom NOTICED TYPOS. Line. 5 13 e ooo -fayach-noe Printed. interests which activities 18 3 yr. Velychia 306121 xxx words attributed increased institutions new annexed in the same place administration only district 5) 6) administration — orders requiring was was done established second chancellery elimination Read. interests which activities 1855 yr.
Majesty 30612] xx glory attributed to the increased establishment of the New Administrative attached there only to areas 4) 5) administrative orders were required. a second chancellery was established! and eliminating R. s PROVISIONS EXTRACTED FROM THE WORKS OF THE NOBILITY IN ROSALINOT BEGAN IN, UNTIL THE MINE OF ERYPOCHINAGO RIGHTS, WHICH WILL BE PUBLICLY DEFENDED by the Professors of the Imperial University of St. Vladimir, A. V. Romanovich-Slavatinsky, ‘Plya student of Stephen’s doctor, a state person.
KEEV. - IN UNIVERSITY PRINTING, 1870. eiem political 2 VH we will appear 6006] yam KI orim equal here 30 UNDERSTAND and OP ruyu: her opt iljoya o y = ovopan AE EM I UT. Indigenous. The basic foundations of our social system are purely democratic, “based on the unity of the classless” land, and the unlimited autocrat of the Russian land. UP. Main. The content, the history of the Russian nobility lies in the duties that lay upon it. The rights of the nobility were granted as retribution for the duties of the nobility, and not therefore on a legal basis, but only. political.
The motive for the property relations of the nobility is a state one: the main source of noble fortunes is the grant of fan-shaped monarchs to SEIMI, G g US. The logical consequence of the introduction of compulsory service for the nobility in 1762. and the charter of 1785: the peasants were supposed to be exempted from compulsory service to the pomfs, ‘I was granted to them, a charter. But the importance of this measure, the nervousness of the government, the imperfection of the means of “management” and the underdevelopment of the nobility itself, delayed its implementation on the final table. g TX.
The motive for establishing serfdom was a state reality, but its detailed development was carried out in fact, ‘under: the same subordination. self-interested interests and arbitrariness of pompists. Legislation on the law of fasting was fragmentary, casuistic in nature, and the evidence was that it was supposed to be! The life of the serf peasants was much worse than their position under the law. X. The question of the legality of the civil law could be raised for the first time only if the compulsory service of the nobility was abolished.
After the first arousal, this question was the subject of a passionate dispute between Ablojuschunists and serfs for a whole century. In this respect, the government, despite its neutrality, was always abolitionist, and the nobility more serf-like. - `HT With the disunity of the interests of the royal officials in the 17th century, there could be no solidary corporate ties between them, and therefore no local landowning societies, the need for the organization of which begins to be felt in the context of compulsory service.
HI "Ekaterina 'P' tries to satisfy this need with a salary letter: she organizes noble societies, imposing