The nannying Tories face oblivion if they refuse to get their priorities straight


The same day the gas bill doubled, it snowed. Oh, and restaurants have been tasked with listing calorie counts on menus. After 12 years in power, the Conservatives have gone from trying to fix the state to trying to fix us, so we’ll be less of a shivering, fat burden on the bureaucrats. Do not eat, they advise; do not steal, do not drive, avoid using the heater. In fact, it would help if we could stop existing altogether. The NHS would be fine on paper if no one used it, and we would have a zero per cent failure rate in schools if no one ever sat an exam.

As MPs take a break from Parliament this week, the Tories need to insist on what they have actually done and what needs to be done. This all hinges on the question of who they really represent. Considering their election to erase the economic mess left by work, it is a real chore to note that the debt is higher than in Gordon Brown, the tax burden rising and the standard of living crashing. We can’t blame ministers for a pandemic or a war, it’s true, but the Conservative Party’s solutions are nearly indistinguishable from New Peines, and the alternatives rarely get aired. Last week I sat on Rishi Sunak’s ‘grill’ from the Treasury Committee and the two points I never heard made were ‘you spend too much’ and ‘how dare you take my constituents’ money to do it “. The anger is not there. No party in Westminster represents the consumer.

This is not just a crisis of philosophy, it is undemocratic. MPs are supposed to be elected to do what their constituents want, but too many of them, as soon as they arrive in Westminster, are absorbed into a culture that has a uniform idea of ​​what constituents need, a total life plan that goes from cutting carbon to dropping enough weight to fit into a size six dress (even better if you’re a guy!). Half the debates are foot-curlingly pious nonsense that does the electorate no benefit except to reassure them that their MP is spectacularly compassionate – and the more laws you pass, goes the logic, the more money we splash , more compassionate, they seem to be . Ergo, the most important measure of success in 2022 is how much the treasury spends, not results.

Where to start? The Ockenden report said more than 200 babies and nine mothers could have survived had it not been for the failings of the Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust. During the lockdown, the government allocated around £37billion to the deeply ineffective Test and Trace project. He lost £4.9billion in loan fraud. Not a single police officer has been sacked over the Rotherham child abuse scandal. And the same Interior Ministry that struggles to deport foreign-born criminals is oddly struggling to let Ukrainian women and children in.

You’re paying for all of this, and probably more thanks, despite Sunak’s tinkering, to a combination of National Insurance changes and inflation pushing people into ever-higher tax brackets. The chancellor, in his munificence, says he plans to cut income tax in 2024, which means the UK government is now handing out IOUs. At the same time he also pays us £200 to help with electricity bills, a sum which the state will later recover, meaning he has also taken to writing ‘UOMes’. MPs receive a small grant of their own. Their wages will rise by 2.7% to £2,212.

If the government of a private company, you change supplier. However, whether you vote right or left, it always seems to end up running P&O.

What’s gone is the old-fashioned principle of giving us the best possible service at the lowest possible price. On the contrary, thanks to Covid, the public sector has taken the reins since 2020, while the burden of wealth and power has shifted decisively away from the individual. Does this look like a freer society than 12 years ago? Or a happier one? Paranoia and suspicion are not only prevalent but encouraged (ads on the London Underground now warn against ‘staring’), and privacy is dead. I remember when we were told to protect our data. Now, just to catch a train to Belgium, I have to prove my vaccination status by downloading the NHS app, sending them a photo of my driving license and recording a video of my face reciting a series of numbers. Am I to believe that the NHS will delete all this information once used? Be blessed. I would rather invite a rabid fox to guard the hens.

In a way, we have learned that we need a more active state, able, for example, to mount a vaccination program, just as we need some state management to ensure that we have a proper diagnostics industry. Small government does not mean ‘no government’, but more efficient government – ​​more efficient precisely because it limits itself to a narrower range of tasks in which it can excel. Drawing a line under the Trimalchio feast of a spring statement, the Tories must spend the time they have before the next election peeling red tape where it is not needed, shifting benefits to people who have been stolen to pay for it, and come up with creative ways to encourage privacy to live again. I’m not just talking about talking about new markets in insurance or energy, but also about liberating culture and technology, faith and family, the very things that make life worth living. hard to live.

Instead, there is a feeling that under Covid the whole of society has been mobilized by the state, an atmosphere of regimented tension that died down briefly at the start of the year only to be reinvigorated by the Ukraine. The taxpayer must be pressed for the collective will, and submit to it as a good citizen. The Parliament and Health Services Ombudsman told The Telegraph over the weekend that the company behind HS2 had treated residents concerned about the line running through their neighborhood, or even their homes, as a ‘nuisance’, an image of the path of literal iron that sums up where we are. Voters, in the eyes of far too many people, are propagators of disease or pollution (in the opinion of certain old ladies who stick to the roads, farming should even be stopped), and pockets of money which are waiting to be exploited.

The paradoxical goal of conservative politics is to make politics less important in everyday life, and while it may seem hopelessly idealistic to expect powerful people to have redemption power, unless conservatives attempt to reduce the state, they will eventually lose office altogether. The time will come when the voters finally snap in, and prevail.


About Author

Comments are closed.